Jump to content

Talk:Subhas Chandra Bose

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

False Accusations on Netaji

[edit]

User fowler&fowler is trying to defend a false accusation about Netaji being an antisemitic just for his alliance with the Axis during ww2. How ever this is a totally false notion and the alliance was actually an enemy's enemy sort of thing. Also I would like to draw the example of Finland, who got support from Germany due to the Soviet invasion, but were not Anti Semitic and had refused to Hitler's demand against Jews in Finland. The Same applies for Netaji and the INA, who were fighting British colonialism and the BRUTAL tortures and FAMINES (Search: Bengal Famine) inflicted by them. He was a hero and is respected by Indians, as a freedom fighter. Please stand up against this propaganda of falsely accusing him. SuvGh (talk) 14:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not a false accusation. Read the whole Subhas Chandra Bose#Anti-semitism. CharlesWain (talk) 14:44, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please refer to correct sources which are not biased. 2409:4060:2D8A:53A9:0:0:5A08:E408 (talk) 15:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@CharlesWain But ok, I'll here you out. If you have to put it, you have to give proper sources, and not put in the introductory page, but somewhere in the later sections. Because, for the sake of argument even if we agree it's true, I'll say that the fact the G. Washington had slaves of his own which is why he didn't outright ban slavery, is not written in his introductory page. This guys means a lot of emotions to Indians, and it's good to respect that. He did do a lot for the Independence movement, so till it's settled, you can put it in the back somewhere. And sorry for any mean-ness I might have shown to you. SuvGh (talk) 16:08, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
can you agree to this atleast? SuvGh (talk) 16:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wasn't anti-Semitism already opposed by masses since the 20th century? Slavery was not universally opposed when George Washington was in power. Nevertheless, he did an exceptional work (for that time) by freeing his slaves upon his will. In smaller words, you cannot use his example to justify your emotive POV. CharlesWain (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Idk what sources you have seen,but slavery was a moral evil all the time.Also Netaji's contributions also lies in helping the poor even when he was a child.So either add both +ve and the "-ve" where ever u have encountered it,with proper sources,or leave it in the back pages,and forget about it.In this case I agree with user SuvGh and the a anonymous user.
If you don't have proper sources,don't spread hatred. SuvGh (talk) 01:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • typo- I, user SuvGh agree with that anonymous user.
anyways please provide verified and NON british sources(Important) in the talk page, before further edits SuvGh (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I have noticed this before when I came across this page and I hoped someone would fix this. Thank you for speaking up for this. This is indeed a mis-guided endeavour to defem a national Hero. 2409:4060:2D8A:53A9:0:0:5A08:E408 (talk) 15:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@2409:4060:2D8A:53A9:0:0:5A08:E408 Thanks for the support. SuvGh (talk) 16:01, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I have readded the original citations to the lead sentence until January 25, two days after SCB's 128 birth anniversary. Please see MOS:LEADCITE which states: "The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus. Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations."

Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for locking the page until July January 25

[edit]

user:Vanamonde93, user:RegentsPark, user:Bbb23, user:Drmies and user:Bishonen: May I request that the page be locked in its WP:STATUSQUO version, (see here) starting today and until January 25? Every year, for a few days before and after Bose's birthday on the 23rd, there is edit-warring on this page, often over content in the lead. Otherwise, the page has remained relatively stable. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See this edit. Just SuvGh needs to be blocked per WP:NOTHERE. Capitals00 (talk) 16:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fowler, you mean Jan 25 as above, not July as the header has it, right? Seems a sensible request. Johnbod (talk) 17:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Johnbod. Thanks for that. Have corrected. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:30, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 January 2025

[edit]

Died: Not Confirmed. Death Place: Not Confirmed. ( There is no valid proof of his death. So if any website tells his death day, it is completely false information. Please correct it.) 115.187.42.51 (talk) 18:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Numerous official reports and enquiries have concluded that Bose did die on 18 August 1945. That some people choose not to believe this is well covered in the article. Nthep (talk) 18:34, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Empire of Japan or Japanese Fascism

[edit]

An editor changed a Wiklink from Japanese Fascism to Empire of Japan.[1] And another editor has reverted it back to Japanese Fascism,[2] saying that Bose's collaboration was with ideologies, not necessarily the formal names of states; the Empire of Japan had existed since the Meiji Restoration, but it was Japanese Fascism, the one complicit in major war crimes during WWII, that Bose had allied with. Given that page 345 of the source cited for the quotation said "To many, Bose's programme resembled that of the Japanese fascists..."[3] this seems entirely sensible. But if you think it should Wikilink to Empire of Japan, please explain why.

P.S. Please do not alter the quotation to say "imperialists"; the source says "fascists".-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]