Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

12 April 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< April 11	April 13 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Amy Hall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While her works are somewhat notable, her herself isn't exactly, failing WP:GNG. It's a stub, I get it, but there's so little information on here and almost nothing on Google. We don't even know if she's alive or not. KrystalInfernus (talk) 17:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jamee E. Comans

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This immigration judge does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. She has been mentioned recently in the news in relation to Detention of Mahmoud Khalil, but there is no significant coverage of her personally, and prior to Khalil's case, hardly any mentions of her at all. One source, lawyerdb.org, scrapes data, and the other is non-independent. FactOrOpinion (talk) 16:43, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:58, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Louisiana, People, and Women

Beauty pageants of Korea

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is by and large a compilation of unreferenced statistics that becomes both duplicative of existing pageant articles and a WP:INDISCRIMINATE coatrack for other trivia. Many debates over massive lists of pageant placements like this have occurred and consensus is that they should not exist. See history at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albania at major beauty pageants, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarus at major beauty pageants, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denmark at major beauty pageants, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/France at major beauty pageants for examples where dozens of such articles were deleted. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:43, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Raigarh (1689)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another failed redirect, later contested by the author of the article. My reasoning is- why doesn't this have coverage around the battle itself? There's no need for aftermath without a substantial coverage of "Battle". Shakakarta (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Asia, India, and Maharashtra. Shakakarta (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Raigarh (1703–1704)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My reason is that the article receives no coverage beyond two lines in Jacques Tony's source, and doesn't pass WP:NEVENT. It remained a stub for years with no improvement at all. Shakakarta (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Asia, India, and Maharashtra. Shakakarta (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Second Battle of Midnapur (1746)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

reason-

Is this even a battle? Mir Jafar won a decisive battle against Mir Habib. That's all I found for this conflict. No coverage as previously deemed by redirects [1]. Moreover the article was created by a sock who had a history of creating messy articles. Shakakarta (talk) 15:51, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Asia, Bangladesh, India, Bihar, and West Bengal. Shakakarta (talk) 15:51, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Paranda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barely had coverage. Not more than 2-3 lines of coverage. No information of how this "Battle of Paranda" went through, clearly not salvageable. Shakakarta (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Asia, India, Delhi, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan. Shakakarta (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Samad Khan's expedition against the Sikhs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no significant coverage for the battle in the sources.

Surinder Singh Johar (2002) only provides a paragraph worth of coverage to the actual conflict. Same thing with Kharak Singh (1996), Harbans Singh (1994), G.S. Chhabra (1960) and Surjit Singh Gandhi (1999). The sources do not consider this conflict as a standalone event or even call it by the name it is created under, they discuss it in the broader context of conflict between Mughals and Sikhs. This topic therefore fails WP:N and WP:GNG. The relevant parts can be covered at Nawab Kapur Singh. Koshuri ^(グ) 15:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and India. Koshuri ^(グ) 15:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sikhism and Punjab. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:40, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance Against Depression

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an WP:ESSAY full of WP:OR. I prodded, which was endorsed by another editor, which was contested without improvement. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:56, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Germany, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:41, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dive Studios

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DIVE Studios. G4 was declined, so bringing it back for discussion. Currently has zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources (one of them does not even mention the subject). Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I was the admin which declined the speedy, based on sources varying from the original process. I'm unimpressed with sources applied and my reasonable BEFORE finds nothing better on the web. Run-of-the-mill applies. Happy to see improvement, but now it's still an A7, so far as I can see. BusterD (talk) 14:58, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Mack (restaurateur)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find significant coverage on the person, but only on his family, and projects (resorts, hotels, etc) he is involved. Not sufficient media coverage for general notability for people. Unicorbia (talk) 14:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:38, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comstock's

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

COI editing which was first deleted through a prod, then through AfD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comstock's magazine, although the article was restored through DRV, due to some behavioral issues. However, Oaktree b's analysis of the sourcing holds true. Not seeing enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So the main concern is a lack of WP:RS, which I disagree with. The magazine has been covered multiple times in big newspapers like the Sacramento Bee and Sacramento Business Journal, indicated by source 2 and source 7. It's also been covered by smaller papers like the Elko Daily Free Press (source 14) and The Placer Herald (source 12). But because this is Wikipage on a magazine, we should consider WP:NMEDIA for help determining notability. In the sub-section for "Newspapers, magazines and journals," Comstock's meets the first, second, third and fifth criteria. It has won awards (sources 26 and 27), it has a significant history (source 30), it is considered a reliable source as it's articles have been used as citations on about 30 different Wikipages, and it covers a non-trivial niche market, which is the Sacramento metropolitan area (source 1). Comstock's is a member of the California News Publishers Association (source 4), which is criteria 4 of WP:NEWSNOTE. While Comstock's isn't a newspaper, it's unique for a magazine to be a member of a state-wide journalism organization, so that point should count towards notability. Eric Schucht (talk) 15:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:38, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

530 (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG, as only source that is about the song is this rather short, routine "this video just came out" spot from Billboard. Should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:21, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:21, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am in favor of keeping the page due to the song's history behind it. I do agree however that it is lacking specific sources. If that can be corrected the article deserves to stay. Azuzist (talk) 05:04, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 14:15, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: As it fails it fails GNG - no significant coverage in most of the sources.Uncle Bash007 (talk) 14:52, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Could not find significant, reliable coverage of the song on its own. Most coverage seems to be about the event of the song's release/re-release to fix mumbling.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 14:56, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybach Music 2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. Should be redirected to its album (Deeper Than Rap). ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 14:14, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DirectX plugin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG UtherSRG (talk) 12:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 12:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:12, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to DirectX#Components. Does not seem to be notable on its own, and is already mentioned on the main DirectX page

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 15:03, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Avathuvadi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find this town in 2011 census of India. As the census does include villages with small or no population, lack of this town's presence in the census seems to indicate lack of legal recognition for WP:GEOLAND. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and India. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this can be deleted Rupesh Kumar Saigal (talk) 12:48, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:12, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frank S. Jorga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the sources are dedicated solely to the Webid company or are based on interviews and statements. There is no clear notability per Anybio and gng. Unicorbia (talk) 14:10, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:37, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eren Legend (bodybuilder)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously soft-deleted for lack of notability. I doubt the topic has since become notable. Janhrach (talk) 13:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Sportspeople, Bodybuilding, and Canada. Janhrach (talk) 13:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Does not appear to have valid secondary sourcing to prove WP:GNG. There's just a slight mention of him in the CBC article which is the only quality source I can consider. Source #4 is dead. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 23:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Eren Legend meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines due to his recognized impact in the bodybuilding community. He has been featured in reputable fitness magazines and websites, with coverage from independent sources discussing his achievements and training insights. His involvement in bodybuilding competitions and contributions to fitness culture further support his notability. Deleting the article would remove a relevant figure from the fitness community, and the existing sources substantiate his presence in the field. Therefore, I believe the article should be kept at least a Biography stubs. Lukadon (talk) 03:14, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley Shaftel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to show they pass GNG. The two obits are paid spots. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:47, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Architecture, and New York. Shellwood (talk) 13:51, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All I can find is brief mentions of him in real estate notices as the architect of a house or housing estate, and brief quotes from him about the features of his designs. None of this amounts to the significant coverage needed for WP:GNG or WP:NCREATIVE notability. And his academic position does not have any evidence of WP:PROF notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:54, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: More than a trivial amount of mentions in older architectural magazines [2], book mentions [3]. Clicking on the Gbooks link above brings up many mentions. Oaktree b (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your first link appears from its thumbnail to be a business directory and does not allow me to see more than the thumbnail. Your second is exactly the sort of thing I meant by "brief mentions of him in real estate notices as the architect of a house or housing estate"; I do not think it constitutes in-depth coverage. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:56, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I agree that if you just click on "Find Sources" on this nomination template, several options are there to find the sources. — Maile (talk) 00:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Smoke and Fire (Sabrina Carpenter song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:23, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:23, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - there was a review of the music video in People, but it doesn't appear to have charted. Ping me if you find anything else. Bearian (talk) 22:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - same as previous. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - as per reasons above. Maxwell Smart ¹²³³²¹ 12:12, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Channelling Liz here: merge to where? I can't find any studio album where this song was included, and merging to the artist page seems inappropriate.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:34, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Akash Ambani

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTINHERITED.

Upon doing WP:BEFORE, I can only find promotional puff pieces sources that fail WP:NEWSORGINDIA, and have already been addressed in the discussion such as Talk:Mukesh Ambani#Akash Ambani is now Chairman of Reliance Jio. ZDRX _{(User) |}_(Contact) 12:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:19, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, only one source gives fairly WP:SIGCOV, others are written in same style and formatting indicating an effort possibly aimed at creating this page. Mekomo (talk) 13:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Most of the sources sound promotional and subject has failed to meet WP:ANYBIO.:— Preceding unsigned comment added by Uncle Bash007 (talk • contribs)
Delete per nom. I note that Wikipedia does not have a standalone article about more notable Mukesh Ambani relative named Anant Ambani. Having one about Akash Ambani is even more meaningless. Koshuri ^(グ) 15:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject is the chairman of JIO which is the largest mobile network operator in India and the third largest mobile network operator in the world with over 46.37 crore (463.78 million) subscribers. Has received lot of coverage due to the fact that he is Chairman of Jio and the claim for notability is based on this. particularly finance and business newspapers have covered him.He is in Time's 100 emerging leaders' list and the only Indian in the list.He also figures in Fortune's '40 Under 40' list of influential people.Added References clearly passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8]^[9]^[10]^[11]^[12]^[13]^[14]^[15]^[16]^[17]^[18]^[19]^[20]^[21]^[22]^[23]^[24][reply]

References

^ Prakash, Aryan (29 September 2022). "Akash Ambani is the only Indian in Time Magazine's emerging leaders' list". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 12 April 2025.
^ "Jio Telecom head Akash Ambani on Time's 100 emerging leaders' list". Business Standard. 28 September 2022. Retrieved 12 April 2025.
^ "Akash Ambani on Time's 100 emerging leaders' list". The Times of India. 28 September 2022. Retrieved 12 April 2025.
^ "Who is Akash Ambani? Know all about the new chairman of Reliance Jio and son of billionaire Mukesh Ambani". Free Press Journal. 28 July 2022. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
^ "Who Is Akash Ambani? 5 Facts About Reliance Jio's New Chairman". NDTV. 28 June 2022. Retrieved 15 July 2022.
^ "Position of power: Akash Ambani moves from open office to Jio corner room". Business Standard. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
^ "Everything you want to know about Akash Ambani, the new chairman of Reliance Jio Infocomm". GQ. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
^ "Akash Ambani, chairman, Reliance Jio: Learning the ropes from the best teacher in town". Financial Times. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
^ "Reliance empire succession: what to know about Akash Ambani, from his support of Mumbai Indians, Ivy League education to love of luxury cars". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
^ "Inheritors of Reliance Empire:Know Everything about Akash and Isha Ambani". Outlook. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
^ "Akash Ambani: Meet the new Chairman of Reliance Jio". Hindu Businessline. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
^ "Akash Ambani Appointed as Reliance's Chairman, All you Need to Know About Him". India Today. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
^ "Isha, Akash Ambani, Ghazal Alagh in Hurun's under-35 list of entrepreneurs: Check list here". Hindustan Times. 26 September 2024. Retrieved 30 September 2024.
^ "Akash Ambani: A look at the new Reliance Jio chief's journey with RIL's telecom arm". Moneycontrol. 29 June 2022. Retrieved 30 September 2024.
^ "Akash Ambani". Fortune India. 15 October 2024. Retrieved 12 April 2025.
^ Sengupta, Trisha (1 March 2025). "Akash Ambani on work-life balance: Jio boss opens up about working for 12 hours, thanks wife Shloka for understanding". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 12 April 2025.
^ "Meet Akash Ambani, the eldest son of Mukesh Ambani & the man behind Reliance Jio: Know about his education, net worth & more". Financialexpress. 2 June 2023. Retrieved 12 April 2025.
^ "I don't think about work by number of hours, but quality of work done daily: Reliance Jio Infocomm chairman Akash Ambani". The Hindu. 1 March 2025. Retrieved 12 April 2025.
^ "'Doors of Jio campus are open for anyone who would like to visit': Akash Ambani". Moneycontrol. 1 March 2025. Retrieved 12 April 2025.
^ Anand, Vijay (1 March 2025). "Akash Ambani says JioBrain, Cloud PC application will launch soon". CNBCTV18. Retrieved 12 April 2025.
^ The Hindu Bureau (3 April 2025). "Akash Ambani prays at Lord Venkateswara temple in Tirumala". The Hindu. Retrieved 12 April 2025.
^ Misra, Apoorva (1 March 2025). "Built Across 500 Acres, World-Class Sporting Facilities: Akash Ambani Shares Details Of Jio Campus". News18. Retrieved 12 April 2025.
^ "Reliance Jio Chairman Akash Ambani wants Indian data to be stored locally". The Economic Times. 15 October 2024. Retrieved 12 April 2025.
^ "Isha, Akash Ambani, Byju Raveendran debut on Fortune's '40 Under 40' influencer list". The Times of India. 2 September 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

Darren Walsh (tennis)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This tennis player never played an ATP Tour level, Grand Slam or Davis Cup match, there are no references on this article and when I searched I found only very brief, passing mentions usually in results lists and one story on the University of Bath website about his doubles partner which mentioned they played together but nothing substantial about him. I therefore believe this article fails GNG and SIGCOV guidelines and should be deleted. I would have Prodded it but a check of the edit history reveals it was Prodded in 2015 and deProdded using what I think are now defunct criteria. Anxioustoavoid (talk) 12:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Sports, Tennis, and United Kingdom. Anxioustoavoid (talk) 12:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Challenger doubles title is of a high enough level to meet WP:NTENNIS. My search for sources has found a small bio at [4], but his relatively common name is polluting my search results with entries about other people. Iffy★Chat -- 13:43, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I may be missing something (and I apologise if I am) but the link goes to a diary style article about an under 14s event that, yes mentions Mr Walsh, but is written by one of his fellow 14 year old teammates. Also having a common name does not give you a pass to say the article should exist. How about adding the word tennis to your search? I did so and, as I stated, discovered routine match results and the aforementioned university story about his doubles partner. Anxioustoavoid (talk) 15:37, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That source I found has a few biographical details in the bottom right which si more than you get from a lot of WP:ROUTINE coverage. I haven't !voted yet as you opened this AfD only a few hours ago and I want to spend more time looking for sources. Iffy★Chat -- 15:44, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with the nominator that there is a lack of significant coverage to establish notability as most mentions are brief. Note that WP:NTENNIS is saying that people who reach achieve in one of the 5 categories listedare likely to have coverage that meets notability guidelines, not that the achievement itself indicates notability.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 15:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And, as a comment, I'm not convinced winning a challenger tournament is a good indicator of whether significant, non-routine coverage would exist for a player.Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 15:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Per lack of WP:SIGCOV. If news sources appears, I'll change the vote. Svartner (talk) 16:00, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Love, Faith, Hope

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Was a soft delete back in 2022, recently undeleted without improvement. 3 of the 4 sources in the article do not even mention the subject. I'll quote the previous nominator's (Vacant0) rationale, since it still applies: "I've only found passing mentions such as: attendance of a protest during the 2022 North Kosovo crisis, announcement that they will take part in the 2022 Belgrade City Assembly election (they ended up placing second to last with only 5,000 votes), an anti-government event that was organized by its leader (Nemanja Šarović) and the announcement that Šarović formed this movement. Additionally, this movement has not been represented in any legislature since its foundation, and it seems to entirely be focused on the actions and announcements of its leader (its facebook page can be also seen as proof of this besides these sources that I've listed)." Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:34, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Nemanja Šarović: The movement has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. Its activities are mostly tied to its leader Šarović. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 12:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism, Politics, and Serbia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:18, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Meyers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

U.S. military officer, known for being relieved of command of the U.S. base in Greenland for apparently political reasons. But that is the only context in which I can find media coverage of her, making this a WP:BLP1E case. The article is also about essentially nothing else but that incident. Said incident is already covered in about the same length at Pituffik Space Base, to which this title could be redirected. Sandstein 12:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, Politics, and United States of America. Sandstein 12:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Failed GNG, weak sources as most of the sources are ot reliable, independent. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 14:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Designbox

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software; can't find any SIGCOV besides a few trivial mentions ([5], [6]). Deproded in 2010 without explanation. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Computing, and Software. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, has been without sources since it was created and still nothing indicating its notability. Sources in the article are primary to the subject. Mekomo (talk) 13:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Burdwan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than the single short blurb in the source in the article, I cannot find any other in-depth information about this battle. Many mentions, most of which are mirrors of this Wiki article, but nothing in-depth. Contested redirect. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and India. Shellwood (talk) 12:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and West Bengal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Passing mentions and nothing more than that, I had redirected previously but was reverted. Given its meagre notability, this is unsalvageable. Shakakarta (talk) 15:29, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fire (Kids See Ghosts song)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Chart performance does not indicate notability, no awards or honors, not recorded by several notable artists, bands, or groups. Moreover, mostly album reviews support the article, not a single independent source talking only about the song itself. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:06, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the song has received significant coverage despite a lack of independent sources, having 25 that are relevant to it (not including chart positions). The live performance further constitutes notability because it goes into detail about the setting and the song also charted in six countries, which is a good amount and can help with notability when the previous are all true. --K. Peake 08:07, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 11:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Middle of Starting Over

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; not enough WP:SIGCOV. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:28, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:28, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 18:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - strong reviews, and millions of views of the video. Bearian (talk) 22:48, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Video views definitely do not pertain to any notability policy. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:45, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is good. I just saw the other one is now a dead link. This one has two paragraphs and a quote, but that's all I can find. So I agree that it's pretty weak as far as significant coverage. It's confusing because the song is basically a Gold Record. Bearian (talk) 00:34, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
With no sources about this song, NSONG is not met. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 00:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirected to its album. Video views are not a source for notability. Headline planet is not reliable source and ScreenRant doesn't strike me as reliable either. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 11:24, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable at all. Maxwell Smart ¹²³³²¹ 12:11, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Honeymoon Fades

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:59, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 11:24, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Time (Sabrina Carpenter song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:16, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:16, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 18:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 11:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Didn't even chart, nothing noteworthy or impactful on the page, and not notable whatsoever. Maxwell Smart ¹²³³²¹ 12:05, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hyderabad Heroes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSPORT with very limited WP:SIGCOV Agent 007 (talk) 17:21, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Sports, Rugby league, and India. Agent 007 (talk) 17:21, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Telangana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:43, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It has just been created. Within the next couple of days, more details and sources will be added. It’s foolish to list it for deletion without giving it time to be completed. OCDD (talk) 06:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should be completed in draft space. Draftify Mn1548 (talk) 07:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: AGF relist to give User:OCDD more time to work on this, since I don't see a strong consensus for any one outcome yet. However, I will note that OCDD has only made [7] one edit to this page since their !vote. I strongly encourage them to make good on their promise to add more details and sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 11:19, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Crybaby (SZA song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; no WP:SIGCOV of this song. Should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the rationale of "no WP:SIGCOV" is baffling; a HotNewHipHop source cited in the article proves otherwise. That aside, there was coverage of this song back when it was still unreleased, starting with the BST Hyde Park teaser (Wonderland magazine, Nylon, Teen Vogue). It was teased again at Lollapalooza 2024, which Rolling Stone covered (although briefly, I will admit). Regardless, all of these sources highlight the lyrics, composition, and/or accompanying visuals (that specified some sort of bug aesthetic), in some form or another. I'd argue these constitute enough SIGCOV for the song. Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 19:25, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A single HNHH review is not sufficiently significant coverage, in my view. Without a source that connects those pre-release sources to Crybaby, it’s original and irrelevant as far as establishing the song’s notability. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 19:40, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Without a source that connects those pre-release sources to Crybaby" I do not know what this means and I am sure no enwiki deletion guideline (or any guideline for that matter) supports this either. Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 07:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Repeating what I've said about SIGCOV somewhere else: for an article subject to have SIGCOV, there should be "more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." With most of the sources above that is clearly what is happening. And SNGs do not supersede GNG; "A topic is presumed to merit an article if (1) it meets either the [GNG] or [SNG]", to quote WP:N. Furthermore, there is enough content in this article such that merging it to the album article in a way that would keep the essential, cited information would give the subject undue weight (all this to say that NOPAGE does not apply). Quoting a sample of the references used in the article to show the coverage the song has received:
In Nylon, "After hinting at something new in the works, the SOS singer just shared an ethereal and mysterious clip featuring new music — and an earthy and fresh aesthetic. 'I know you told stories about me,' she croons over a groovy bass line and distant nature sound effects. 'Most of them awful, all of them true. Here's some for you.' In the clip, which appears to be for new track 'Storytime,' a camera pushes through a dark forest before stopping in front of a blue-colored, insect-like creature with long antennae. As it turns out, the bug in question is none other than SZA herself [...] And if there was any doubt about what the visual pivot implied, she confirmed that her long-awaited follow-up is, in fact, coming after playing the 'Storytime' snippet in London. 'New album, you ready?' she shouted to an enthusiastic crowd."

In HotNewHipHop, "Its origins supposedly trace back to a Hyde Park set in London during the summer of this year. Then, it was teased at the end of the full music video for 'Drive' yesterday. Now, the completed version is here, and it's got some great writing and stunning singing, which is what you come to expect from SZA. It finds her taking on her flaws and insecurities and embracing them. Overall, she's faced a lot of pressure throughout her career; something she acknowledges on the first verse. But the way she was able flip the narrative around on her 'Cry Baby' is special. [indicates what the writer believes are 'quotable lyrics']"

In Teen Vogue, "She also teased a snippet of an unreleased track called 'Storytime' during her set and made things official on Instagram by posting a teaser of her forthcoming album featuring the song and mimicking her new set’s aesthetics, ending with a closeup of SZA herself transformed into a bug [...] Fans believe all the teasers are in reference to Lana, which the singer had previously announced as her next album [...] There have been plenty of teasers for the project to date, but her BST performance is the first time the singer has referenced a 'new album' explicitly in a while."

Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 01:12, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: to the album; as I said in the last AfD, charting at 71 (or 70) in this case isn't terribly notable. Sourcing used is focused on the album as a collection of songs, not about any song in particular. The package of songs/album maybe remembered, but each song barely got critical notice by itself. Oaktree b (talk) 19:29, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Elias's rationale above, but also note that the outcome of this AfD nom is potentially dependent on outcome of the ongoing RFC at Wikipedia talk:Notability (music). Flip^and Flopped ツ 02:16, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Was a proper WP:BEFORE actually done on this? There are three song nominations in 3 minutes from Zanahary, not to mention another 10ish in the previous 15, all from exceptionally popular artists. I'm not convinced due diligence is being done on any of these nominations, and it's just putting a burden on other editors.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 02:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are definitely other sources going in depth about the song itself:

https://www.stayfreeradioip.com/post/sza-crybaby-meaning-and-review

https://www.hercampus.com/culture/sza-crybaby-lyrics-explained/

These are more blog-like sources and ultimately may be deemed unreliable, but I would expect them to give some pause for reading between nominations. Considering WP:PRESERVE quickly nominating a bunch of articles based on NSONG should not be a first resort. Start by tagging the articles at least, and if nothing changes come back and then nominate for deletion. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 02:49, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those sources don't seem reliable at all. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 08:37, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 11:13, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Great and Powerful Trixie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough in-depth coverage and no scholarly discussions of this character. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:11, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Television, and Comics and animation. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:29, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shakin' It 4 Daddy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; is not the subject of WP:SIGCOV. Should be redirected to album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 22:30, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 22:30, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to parent album. Only four album reviews, with one sentence each dedicated to the song. Also artists self promo. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:33, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 11:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Redirect to parent album. Having trouble even finding reliable reviews of the album + nothing in depth about the song itself. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 11:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Animales

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. Should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 22:42, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 22:42, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Found this two sources Hype Beast and The BoomBox. They only mention the release of the song. They can be used to support its release as a promotional single on the parental album. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 11:08, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Minimal sources, nothing in depth. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 11:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dijon Carruthers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing but mentions. No in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. Restoring the redirect as an ATD would probably be the best course. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Krešimir Luetić

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Croatian men's footballer who spent his entire career in lower levels without evidence of meeting WP:GNG. Two secondary sources I found were Dalmatinski Nogomet articles from 2022 and 2024, both of which are passing mentions. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:19, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Croatia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:19, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 12:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about a notable incident that was widely covered in reliable sources like Dainik Bhaskar, Times Of India, ANI etc . It has received media attention and public support, including statements from elected officials. It meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for events and deserves to be retained.

2025 Gwalior Khasgi Bazar, Kala Gopal Apartment fire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Incident isn't notable enough for a standalone article. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about a notable incident that was widely covered in reliable sources like Dainik Bhaskar, Times Of India, ANI etc . It has received media attention and public support, including statements from elected officials. It meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for events and deserves to be retained. Michael Fernandes2007 (talk) 08:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about a notable incident that was widely covered in reliable sources like Dainik Bhaskar, Times Of India, ANI etc . It has received media attention and public support, including statements from elected officials. It meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for events and deserves to be retained. Michael Fernandes2007 (talk) 08:58, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Madhya Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:48, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — The article meets the notability criteria under WP:EVENT and WP:NOTE. The Gwalior Khasgi Bazar, Kala Gopal Apartment fire has been covered in-depth by multiple reliable, independent sources, including national and regional media (Assam Tribune, Daijiworld, Wikipedia-cited articles) which reported not only the fire but also the legal aftermath, public safety discussions, and community impact which makes it suitable for WP:RS

This is not a routine local incident — the scale of the event, the involvement of illegally stored hazardous materials, the injury of emergency personnel, and the legal and civic consequences demonstrate lasting notability. The article is verifiable per WP:V and written in a neutral tone in line with WP:NPOV.

Arguments about the article being "recent" WP:RECENT or local WP:LOCAL do not apply here, as the coverage goes well beyond routine reporting and the issues raised are of broader social concern in India.

Unless substantial evidence is presented that this is not a notable event, the article should be retained.

Thanks VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 10:54, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cold in the Earth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Book that fails WP:GNG. No WP:SIGCOV found. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 19:54, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 19:54, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Not exactly very notable, but there is two reviews, which should be enough for NBOOK. Review in Publishers Weekly (here) and Brazosport Facts (here). Also seems to be a review in Booklist (Gale A77135100), but it's just a sentence, and the rest is other books. Also possibly one in The Armchair Detective Volume 27, but I can't find a copy online. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 05:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A good alternative might be for us to make a series page and have the individual entries redirect there. I'm a big fan of having series pages as opposed to individual book entries unless the books are exceptionally notable, like Twilight or ASOIAF/AGOT. If I have time, I'll try to make a page for this, but if anyone else wants to tackle this, feel free. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:38, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Party Favor (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its EP. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 22:53, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 22:53, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Gold or Silver certified song in multiple countries. Bearian (talk) 22:21, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What notability guideline is this from? ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:47, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
NALBUM#3 says exactly this. Note that it is under the heading "Recordings", which includes singles. I am also voting to keep. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 06:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into parent EP Don't Smile at Me. Taking into consideration the sources and everything else it could make a nice paragraph. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:29, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:14, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arrowfield Stud

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, is based on 1 primary source and 1 deadlink. Also issues with WP:PROMO and contains wikilinks to irrelevant subjects. Dfadden (talk) 22:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Horse racing, and Australia. Dfadden (talk) 22:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to John Messara. Apparently Arrowfield is a big operation and very well known in the industry, but everything is founded by John Messara and under the umbrella of "Arrowfield Group Limited" (ARF1), of which Messara is the chairman. There are a LOT of online articles mentioning Arrowfield Stud or -Group, mostly brief mentions as the breeder or owner of this or that horse, but Messara is the main star—searches for any of these names return many quotes by Messara from press inquiries and interviews. Messara seems well-known and well-reputed within the thoroughbred breeding and racing industries in Australia.
Sample search results:
- Thoroughbred Daily News: Arrowfield Stud 645 hits, Arrowfield Group 75 hits, John Messara 287 hits
- Breednet page links to high-dollar sales
- Advertorial in Equestrian Hub

Arrowfield is also the sponsor of a race which has its own wiki-article: Arrowfield Stud Plate. "Arrowfield Stud" appears in 60 wiki articles, at least 18 of which wikilink directly to Arrowfield Stud.

I couldn't find any comprehensive coverage on the stud itself except for articles interviewing Messara (interviews rank as primary sources) but that doesn't mean they don't exist, just that I didn't find any. The John Messara article isn't too long that it couldn't host "Arrowfield" content and redirect all the company names to it. All of the related articles (including the stallion articles) have been edited by likely-COI editors and probably need cleaning up, not deleting.

▶ I am Grorp ◀ 16:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The article needs cleaned up and expanded with pertinent references. Just because they don't exist right now doesn't mean the article needs to be deleted. If the trend is to start deleting articles just because they are stubs then the direction of notice should be for the project to consider improving it. Brudder Andrusha (talk) 14:36, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe so, but no new refs have been added to this article since 2013 and there have been many edits since, including editors who have questioned its notability and referencing issues (see here and [8] edit summaries) Do we keep it for another 12 years in the hope someone eventually fixes it? It also appears that the most recent active contributors may have a WP:COI and currently the only working reference is the farm's own website. My concerns are not just about notability but also about WP:PROMO.
Dfadden (talk) 20:15, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:14, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vulnerable (Selena Gomez song)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:21, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:21, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no revelant sources to support the song on its own. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rare (Selena Gomez album). Has received coverage independent of the album at Glamour, Business Insider, Time, but coverage can probably adequately be incorporated in the album article as I don't see this article's body being more than 4 paragraphs long. Heartfox (talk) 19:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Top 20 song on two charts, and three reviews of at least a full sentence, indicating significant coverage. I'm not opposed to a merger. Bearian (talk) 22:15, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:13, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Per Bearian, The song entered charts in different countries and was featured in reliable sources like Time, Business Insider, and Glamour. Even if the article is short, it meets WP:NSONG with independent and relevant coverage. 06:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

After Midnight (Chappell Roan song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:43, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:43, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Per WP:SIGCOV/WP:GNG "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material". I believe 1, 2, 3 have more than trivial mentions, and along with the other sources used in the article, allow for a reasonably detailed article. Medxvo (talk) 02:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
NSONG is explicit that album reviews do not establish notability for songs. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 02:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Two of these sources are track rankings, not album reviews. Per WP:GNG "It meets either the general notability guideline (GNG) below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG)". An article has to meet either GNG or NSONG, even though it meets NSONG in my opinion for having a reasonably detailed article and two certifications. Medxvo (talk) 03:04, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Full-album track rankings are definitely album reviews. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 03:07, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They still have more than trivial mentions, which should meet WP:GNG. Medxvo (talk) 03:10, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question I agree with Medxvo that the article passes WP:GNG insofar as it has "significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material". However, I also simultaneously agree with Zanahary that this fails WP:NSONG. I think there is an inherent conflict between WP:GNG and WP:NSONG here because multiple instances of in-depth, detailed discussion within album reviews clearly passes the plain language of WP:GNG, but also clearly fail the specific criteria in WP:NSONG. I'm inclined to lean towards a keep vote because WP:GNG says either its language or the subject-specific notability policy can both work, but for them to be basically directly contradictory seems odd. Can anyone provide insight about which one governs - has this issue been discussed by the community in the past? Does this merit an RFC or a modification to these criteria to avoid such a blatant contradiction? Flip^and Flopped ツ 05:23, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Upon consulting other AfD noms, I see some evidence from prior AfDs that the community has interpreted WP:GNG to save the article even when WP:NSONG is not met; see e.g. this 2024 AfD to that effect. In the absence of an RFC clarifying otherwise, I say Keep per WP:GNG's statement that "the article can meet either the general notability guideline (GNG) below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG)" (emphasis added). Flip^and Flopped ツ 17:13, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SIGCOV: there are plenty of reviews that more than name-check the song. As I've said before, mixed reviews are the best way of ascertaining the significance for a book, song, or play. The Pitchfork and Buzzfeed reviews for this single are illustrative of this phenomenon. Bearian (talk) 23:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to parent album. The album reviews don't write more than a sentence about the song. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 10:03, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:12, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Purves

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After removing all the middle names and demoting the partial matches to See also, there are only two entries left, the surname being the obvious primary topic. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:44, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:52, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This article even started out that way: Special:Permalink/191574737. The other article began as a self-contradictory page about some claimed noble family: Special:Permalink/575056908. (It cannot have both originated in Normandy and in Scotland in two different centuries.) The content that was sent over there could be brought back here and this page be given its original purpose back. Uncle G (talk) 05:11, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Move Purves (surname) to Purves, and with a hatnote to the place. Boleyn (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:12, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meteor (juggling)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no decent sources for this that I saw, certainly no reliable/acceptable ones, and none are included in the article, which is just a bunch of OR. Who knows what that book is, but "Flaming Arrow Press" is not much of a publisher. Drmies (talk) 04:59, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Toys and Asia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
At least it didn't have scantily clad manga figures on the cover. But it was spiral bound and illustrated with a cartoon figure. ☺ Having researched Meteor hammer (AfD discussion) and come across no juggling sources at all, I am forgoing doing the same research twice. Flaming Arrow Press was an imprint of Eric Bagai's Foreworks publishing in Portland in the 20th century according to publishing directories. Eric Bagai died in 2022, the Foreworks WWW site is a memorial to xem, and the erstwhile Foreworks book on backgammon is nowadays self-published by its author Jeremy Paul Bagai as Fortuitous Press.
The nail in the coffin for this article is that the "more good info" added by edits such as Special:Diff/637233083 comes not from the source cited, which is a sales catalogue entry and says no such thing at all, but word-for-word from what Wikipedia's meteor hammer article said at the time: Special:Permalink/635843518.
So we have simply doubled-up the fantasy, here.
Uncle G (talk) 10:25, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meteor hammer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no decent sources for this that I saw, certainly no reliable/acceptable ones, and none are included in the article, which is just a bunch of OR. Drmies (talk) 04:58, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Martial arts and China. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:28, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I checked under the purported Chinese name. The Chinese book of C# programming, using a martial arts computer game as an example, that turned up early in the results was not a source. But it was in amongst page after page of books with scantily clad manga figures on the covers that were definitely not sources. I don't know what you have stumbled upon, Drmies, but the books results tell me that it is fantasy and not reality. Yes, I bloody well am judging said books by their covers.
Checking the article talk page I see that people have challenged this for being video game manual fantasy since 2006. Checking the edit history I see that it has been variously sourced to Everything2, and exemplifed by counterfactuals such as the Kill Bill movie series and — Yes. — by anime. The zh:流星錘] article has just two discoverable sources: ISBN 7500060874 I have no access to, although from the citation in that article it seems that it is as suspect a source as the only source cited in this article back in its 2005 incarnation, and ISBN 9789866712210 is explicitly a book of fantasy weapons from a Taiwanese publisher of fantasy books.
So it looks like Wikipedia has been promoting fantasy as fact for 20 years, again.
Uncle G (talk) 09:52, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To add to this: I checked out the images. One is a picture created by a user who appears to be as historical arms enthusiast. The others stem from Flickr, where a private collector named Gary Todd has uploaded images of his collection.

Considering that Todd apparently owns a whole pile of these weapons, you'd think we would have at least one image from a museum collection and/or verified by a historian.

Now there are apparently real historical illustrations of this weapon: https://theravenswoodacademy.com/new-page-69

Not that that by itself would be sufficient for an article. Cortador (talk) 11:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Buumba Halwand

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Sources 2-6 are all databases or results listing. The first book source is actually a small 1 line mention. No SIGCOV exists to meetnWP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 04:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Africa. LibStar (talk) 04:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Zambia at the 1980 Summer Olympics#Athletics, where the subject is mentioned. Fails GNG due to no SIGCOV. Willing to reconsider my !vote if sources come up, so please ping me. Frank Anchor 14:45, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on WP:NEXIST. I expanded the article with a few new WP:RS sources I found the day before it was nominated. Zambia is a notoriously difficult country to research, and there is broadly speaking a systemic bias against African countries and people that affects the level of coverage available to us. Subject was the top marathon runner from his country so coverage should exist in Zambian newspaper sources from the era as soon as they are available to us. --Habst (talk) 15:52, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Boiler Works

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Olympia public arts installation with one source. Again, should be simply included on a list of public art installations in the city. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:43, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Washington. Shellwood (talk) 02:48, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there a list this can be redirected to?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of public art in Olympia, Washington, as this installation is covered on that page. Opm581^{(talk | he/him)} 05:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stage School Australia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The vast majority in unsourced or primary sourced, so I intended to improve the article but very much struggled to find good secondary sources. The school does not seem to fit notability guidelines. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 02:59, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre, Companies, Schools, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:29, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – The article lacks strong independent sources and relies mostly on primary or promotional content. Doesn’t meet WP:GNG or WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Without significant secondary coverage, notability isn’t established. Pridemanty (talk) 06:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Super Graphic Ultra Modern Girl

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; "Illustrate Magazine" piece (the only source cited of which this song is the subject) reads like AI or a child's writing and doesn't appear to be a significant outlet (empty About page); should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:42, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:42, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 discuss the song in detail within articles. Meets WP:GNG "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material". Medxvo (talk) 13:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Regardless of the the result of the ongoing RfC discussion about NSONG and GNG, I believe this has received enough coverage to be significant. The stories behind the songs are being covered in reliable sources outside the specific context of album reviews [9].
Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 02:11, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Billboard and "Vulture sources are reliable and have a very condense paragraph about the song. Not sure if all the other sources are reliable. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:08, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mademoiselle Boop

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG or ANYBIO. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:57, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Entertainment. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:57, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Belgium. Shellwood (talk) 00:32, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per ENTERTAINER and expand based on the French Wikipedia entry. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:28, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:15, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I agree with Another Believer that this article can be kept and expanded based on the French version. I don't have the cultural knowledge to fully understand whether this passes GNG/ANYBIO, but in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE I think this article can be improved from existing French sources rather than deleted at this time.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 01:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The subject meets WP:ENT as a notable performer with coverage in local media and presence in French-language sources. Article can be improved by translating and expanding from the French Wikipedia. Enough basis to preserve and develop instead of delete. Pridemanty (talk) 06:28, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Susan (drag queen)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability criteria. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 00:00, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:19, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Belgium. Shellwood (talk) 00:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:36, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per nom. No notability demonstrated in the present sources. Svartner (talk) 08:59, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Arguably passes WP:CREATIVE because of an international tour. Bearian (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which part of WP:CREATIVE? ꧁Zanahary꧂ 16:15, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:12, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Smruthi K

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria:

If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.

Anybody who checks the first two links, they are YouTube interviews from sources that are listed unreliable at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Guidelines_on_sources (both Indiaglitz and Behindwoods). The third source is a just a short film link.

Also, she is very low-key, dubbing for films in not the original language such as K.G.F 2 (non Kannada/Hindi version) and Petta (non Tamil version). She only seems to dub in Tamil original versions for Raashii Khanna.

A quick WP:BEFORE yields nothing. DareshMohan (talk) 01:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Tamil Nadu. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:14, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Duarte

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun (talk) 00:08, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, California, and Oregon. Let'srun (talk) 00:08, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 00:37, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:14, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I find no sources for this soccer player. What's in the article are primary only. Appears to still be in the minor leagues, so might not have attained enough notice for more media coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 02:15, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSCRIT. No significant coverage in independent sources. The player doesn’t seem notable enough for a separate article. Pridemanty (talk) 06:25, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 12:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson McCracken

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:SPORTSBASIC due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, California, and Oregon. Let'srun (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I am unable to find anything approaching SIGCOV. JTtheOG (talk) 00:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 12:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 12:36, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Issues and Answers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded with source, but there's still not much out there Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Issues and Answers Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AM America

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camel News Caravan Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Huntley–Brinkley Report

[d981-1] Prakash, Aryan (29 September 2022). "Akash Ambani is the only Indian in Time Magazine's emerging leaders' list". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

[q810-2] "Jio Telecom head Akash Ambani on Time's 100 emerging leaders' list". Business Standard. 28 September 2022. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

[u131-3] "Akash Ambani on Time's 100 emerging leaders' list". The Times of India. 28 September 2022. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

[4] "Who is Akash Ambani? Know all about the new chairman of Reliance Jio and son of billionaire Mukesh Ambani". Free Press Journal. 28 July 2022. Retrieved 13 July 2022.

[5] "Who Is Akash Ambani? 5 Facts About Reliance Jio's New Chairman". NDTV. 28 June 2022. Retrieved 15 July 2022.

[6] "Position of power: Akash Ambani moves from open office to Jio corner room". Business Standard. Retrieved 19 July 2022.

[7] "Everything you want to know about Akash Ambani, the new chairman of Reliance Jio Infocomm". GQ. Retrieved 19 July 2022.

[8] "Akash Ambani, chairman, Reliance Jio: Learning the ropes from the best teacher in town". Financial Times. Retrieved 19 July 2022.

[9] "Reliance empire succession: what to know about Akash Ambani, from his support of Mumbai Indians, Ivy League education to love of luxury cars". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 19 July 2022.

[10] "Inheritors of Reliance Empire:Know Everything about Akash and Isha Ambani". Outlook. Retrieved 19 July 2022.

[11] "Akash Ambani: Meet the new Chairman of Reliance Jio". Hindu Businessline. Retrieved 19 July 2022.

[12] "Akash Ambani Appointed as Reliance's Chairman, All you Need to Know About Him". India Today. Retrieved 19 July 2022.

[c937-13] "Isha, Akash Ambani, Ghazal Alagh in Hurun's under-35 list of entrepreneurs: Check list here". Hindustan Times. 26 September 2024. Retrieved 30 September 2024.

[w609-14] "Akash Ambani: A look at the new Reliance Jio chief's journey with RIL's telecom arm". Moneycontrol. 29 June 2022. Retrieved 30 September 2024.

[t404-15] "Akash Ambani". Fortune India. 15 October 2024. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

[o125-16] Sengupta, Trisha (1 March 2025). "Akash Ambani on work-life balance: Jio boss opens up about working for 12 hours, thanks wife Shloka for understanding". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

[b331-17] "Meet Akash Ambani, the eldest son of Mukesh Ambani & the man behind Reliance Jio: Know about his education, net worth & more". Financialexpress. 2 June 2023. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

[r435-18] "I don't think about work by number of hours, but quality of work done daily: Reliance Jio Infocomm chairman Akash Ambani". The Hindu. 1 March 2025. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

[r111-19] "'Doors of Jio campus are open for anyone who would like to visit': Akash Ambani". Moneycontrol. 1 March 2025. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

[t391-20] Anand, Vijay (1 March 2025). "Akash Ambani says JioBrain, Cloud PC application will launch soon". CNBCTV18. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

[z170-21] The Hindu Bureau (3 April 2025). "Akash Ambani prays at Lord Venkateswara temple in Tirumala". The Hindu. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

[v964-22] Misra, Apoorva (1 March 2025). "Built Across 500 Acres, World-Class Sporting Facilities: Akash Ambani Shares Details Of Jio Campus". News18. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

[p590-23] "Reliance Jio Chairman Akash Ambani wants Indian data to be stored locally". The Economic Times. 15 October 2024. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

[k698-24] "Isha, Akash Ambani, Byju Raveendran debut on Fortune's '40 Under 40' influencer list". The Times of India. 2 September 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2025.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]