Talk:Transit bus

"more comfortable"

I don't agree that coach-style lines are universally more comfortable, and in any case that's unjustified and subjective, so I removed the modifier from the lead. Buses are just designed for their purpose, which has been well-defined for some time now--a coach0style bus would not be very comfortable carrying twice as many people as seats.65.117.234.99 (talk) 16:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blurb for DYK

Did You Know

....that a transit bus in the U.S. is usually operated by an urban-suburban bus line, a governmental public transit agency, or a contractor and is used on public transit routes? (suggested image:VOTC9218.jpg)

But what is it...

This article goes straight into discussing operation of transit buses in the United States.

Honestly, they exist elsewhere in the world (I think)... Also it doesn't actually state, in the lead section, what a transit bus is.

Also some references would be nice as to who decided that the bus described is known as a transit bus as opposed to some other term (commuter bus being an alternate name provided in the article).Ga rr ie 11:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, look, a transit bus is a city bus, and in Berks County, it's called a Barta bus. --Mark Lessig (talk) 14:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daewoo City Bus.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Daewoo City Bus.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 3 November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:34, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Transit bus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080127082345/http://www.cleanairnet.org/infopool/1411/propertyvalue-17726.html to http://www.cleanairnet.org/infopool/1411/propertyvalue-17726.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

It is amazing this article was not deleted, free of references as it was, making it all original research. I added a few sources from the US for specifications. I hope others can add more inline references, now that there is a References section. - - Prairieplant (talk) 18:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]